Michele Catalano brings U.S.A. a daunting story of however a series of Google searches light-emitting diode to a visit by
the FBI
local authorities (see update below):It was a confluence of impressive proportions that light-emitting diode six agents from the joint coercion task force to play my door Wed morning. very little did we all know our ostensibly innocent, if curious to a fault, Googling of bound things was making an ideal storm of coercion identification. as a result of somewhere out there, somebody was looking at. somebody whose job it\'s to piece along the items individuals do on the net raised the
red flag after they saw our search history.
I don’t have a lot of to feature at once, tho\' my sense is that this goes to become a far larger story. Or a minimum of it ought to. Catalano has been revealed in BoingBoing, The Magazine et al., and may be a former author for Forbes, thus her quality isn’t doubtful.
UPDATE: Catalano processed that the task force agents weren\'t FBI. geographic area Hill cites the FBI as spoken language they weren\'t concerned, and also the visit was a “local police matter.”
For all we’ve detected concerning PRISM over the last few months, what we tend to haven’t seen area unit clear samples of innocent people–those WHO say they need nothing to hide–having federal agents enter their homes on the idea of some Google searches. The agents during this story aforesaid they perform concerning a hundred of those visits weekly.
Do Pine Tree State a favor, though, and watch this Ad Council business from 2002, place along in response to 9/11, and tell Pine Tree State this isn’t specifically what we tend to were petrified of back then.
red flag when they saw our search history.
I don’t have much to add right now, though my sense is this is going to become a much bigger story. Or at least it should. Catalano has been published in BoingBoing, The Magazine and elsewhere, and is a former writer for Forbes, so her credibility isn’t in doubt.
UPDATE: Catalano clarified that the task force agents were not FBI. Kashmir Hill cites the FBI as saying they were not involved, and the visit was a “local police matter.”
For all we’ve heard about PRISM over the last couple of months, what we haven’t seen are clear examples of innocent people–those who say they have nothing to hide–having federal agents enter their homes on the basis of some Google searches. The agents in this story said they perform about 100 of these visits every week.
Do me a favor, though, and watch this Ad Council commercial from 2002, put together in response to 9/11, and tell me this isn’t exactly what we were afraid of back then:
the FBI
local authorities (see update below):It was a confluence of impressive proportions that light-emitting diode six agents from the joint coercion task force to play my door Wed morning. very little did we all know our ostensibly innocent, if curious to a fault, Googling of bound things was making an ideal storm of coercion identification. as a result of somewhere out there, somebody was looking at. somebody whose job it\'s to piece along the items individuals do on the net raised the
red flag after they saw our search history.
I don’t have a lot of to feature at once, tho\' my sense is that this goes to become a far larger story. Or a minimum of it ought to. Catalano has been revealed in BoingBoing, The Magazine et al., and may be a former author for Forbes, thus her quality isn’t doubtful.
UPDATE: Catalano processed that the task force agents weren\'t FBI. geographic area Hill cites the FBI as spoken language they weren\'t concerned, and also the visit was a “local police matter.”
For all we’ve detected concerning PRISM over the last few months, what we tend to haven’t seen area unit clear samples of innocent people–those WHO say they need nothing to hide–having federal agents enter their homes on the idea of some Google searches. The agents during this story aforesaid they perform concerning a hundred of those visits weekly.
Do Pine Tree State a favor, though, and watch this Ad Council business from 2002, place along in response to 9/11, and tell Pine Tree State this isn’t specifically what we tend to were petrified of back then.
red flag when they saw our search history.
I don’t have much to add right now, though my sense is this is going to become a much bigger story. Or at least it should. Catalano has been published in BoingBoing, The Magazine and elsewhere, and is a former writer for Forbes, so her credibility isn’t in doubt.
UPDATE: Catalano clarified that the task force agents were not FBI. Kashmir Hill cites the FBI as saying they were not involved, and the visit was a “local police matter.”
For all we’ve heard about PRISM over the last couple of months, what we haven’t seen are clear examples of innocent people–those who say they have nothing to hide–having federal agents enter their homes on the basis of some Google searches. The agents in this story said they perform about 100 of these visits every week.
Do me a favor, though, and watch this Ad Council commercial from 2002, put together in response to 9/11, and tell me this isn’t exactly what we were afraid of back then:
No comments:
Post a Comment